The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. On the one hand, new sources have been added to the article since it was nominated. On the other hand, there's no clear consensus whether the available sources are sufficient or insufficient to establish notability. Mz7 (talk) 22:45, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

McCafferty (band)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Virtually no in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources found in searches. Currently wholly unsourced. Was a redirect to the song of this name, which I can't understand why a band would be redirected to a song. Fails WP:GNG, and doesn't come close to passing WP:NMUSIC. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:39, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:41, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable band with no viable third-party sources. Not that it matters in this discussion, but there's also next to nothing on their "official" site. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 00:16, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep references have been added to the article including two magazine articles, alternative press source and a billboard reference that shows they have charted with a peak of 5 on the heatseekers chart, it also suggests they have charted on a different chart but does not display that info Atlantic306 (talk) 01:14, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this band is a total joke Evangp (talk) 14:53, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 04:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep sources confirm charting on Billboard. Between this and the Allmusic bio there's just enough to pass. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:06, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.