The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak Keep One of his works has been reviewed by a third party site. Link. Also, if he had been incarcerated for drug dealing, there is a chance that he may have appeared in a newspaper somewhere.--Kylohk19:44, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now There's no doubt this guy is affiliated with notable people and he has been mentioned in sources such as Prefix mag and SOHH, but so far I don't think that makes the cut. It wouldn't be surprising if he becomes more notable in the future, perhaps after releasing an album that makes the Billboard charts, which in that case would probably warrant an article. And although the article cites little sources, KingTee's comment that the page has original research is just false. Spellcast17:43, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I can't believe I didn't realise that. Anyway, the troll account was indefinitely blocked. Nevertheless, I think this nomination should continue as normal. Spellcast17:58, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.