The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:34, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Mahoney (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We discussed this at WP:RFD#Matt Mahoney and it WP:SNOWballed as a retarget to the DAB at Matthew Mahoney. That is fine but I think wearing WP:TWOHATS we can just hatnote one to the other, which also should save us a disambiguation on one or the other but I assume neither is WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. But I will do the crosslinks after listing this cos someone else, if they disagree, can take em out. It is better to travel hopefully than to arrive. Si Trew (talk) 08:35, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Note - Si Trew closed the Rfd discussion himself; his close was subsequently reverted. However, that discussion seems to have little to do with this one. This discussion was originally at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Mahoney but I moved it here for the benefit of the tools that automatically detect these things. Also worth noting is that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Mahoney (2nd nomination) exists, which I think is Si's good-faith error using the tool, and not meant to have been a separate discussion. This is the only time that this page has been nominated for deletion. My apologies (and on Si's behalf, unless he says otherwise) that this is confusing. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 22:47, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - WP:TWODABS requires that one or the other is the primary topic for the title. I don't think either of these stubs can make that claim. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 22:47, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep No obvious candidate to be Primary Topic, so dab page is appropriate. PamD
• Another note: one more error that I didn't catch. I have updated the links here to Matthew Mahoney which is the subject of this discussion. Matt Mahoney is still up at Rfd. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 15:43, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:40, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, it'll be three entries if we include Matt Mahoney as a WP:DABMENTION from PAQ. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:42, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Pretty clearly keep as there is no primary. Am I misunderstanding Si Trew or is he misunderstanding the guidelines? --Bejnar (talk) 18:57, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.