This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was BJAODNed. It's at a sub-page there now. Hedley 01:30, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense. Very funny though. TomTheHand 04:51, July 24, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. It is funny. But nonsense. (also, the author's tragic misspelling of "choad" has tainted the Matrix.) Nandesuka 04:52, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and ditto.--DNicholls 04:58, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete good for the Uncyclopedia. Hamster Sandwich 06:24, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. One of the funniest things I've ever read. Nonsense. Add to BJAODN. DarthVader 11:38, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Does the Icelandic_Phallological_Museum exist? The article mentions 'Professor Matt Mutino'. DarthVader 11:42, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • This article doesn't mention him, and seems to make it sound like a one-man show. But yeah, it's real...--DNicholls 11:49, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
      • Actually, the person who inserted the Muttino part in the ICPM entry is the same that started the Muttino entry: 69.18.208.67.--DNicholls 11:53, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
        • Phallophobia is real (real=real word), but Matt Muttino doesn't come up under any Google search. And, come on, "head Phallologist" has got to be a joke. --DNicholls 11:56, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
        • Ah right...well the thing is that the article you have given the link of was written in March 2001, and the Mutino article claims that he joined in November 2001, so that article certainly doesn't discredit the wikipedia article. I would like a source for an article about Mutino before changing my vote to a keep. DarthVader 12:00, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
          • Google has zero hits for "Bencolius erectus", the "quasi-humanoid species" which gone extint due to "its overly large and burdensome penis" (also: pls. compare with homo erectus which got its name because it stood up). Among other things this makes me think that this article is a hoax. But at least it's funny. :) Csobankai Aladar 16:45, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• BJAODN. Most definately. --Blu Aardvark | ^{(talk) | (contribs)} 11:40, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Yep BJAODN --malathion ^talk 23:22, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• BJAODN. But it should be placed in the "best picks" section
• BJAODN. JamesBurns 06:54, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• BJAODN. Definitely "best picks" section. (unsigned by 68.199.20.156)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.