The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 13:42, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mathematic modeling of evaporators

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed by author. Ill-digested and largely unintelligible chunk from a textbook on what does not seem to be a particularly noteworthy use of mathematical modelling. WP:NOTTEXTBOOK and WP:DYNAMITE spring to mind. TheLongTone (talk) 14:41, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Evaporator, better fit there. - SanAnMan (talk) 14:44, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:35, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:36, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I wish there was salvageable content in that essay, but I do not see it. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 16:23, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not appear to be any novel cited content to salvage for merger. Probably part of a school project (see also Stefan tube involving overlapping set of new accounts having no activity outside this fluidics/physics garden). DMacks (talk) 14:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as still currently questionable for a better separate article. SwisterTwister talk 06:44, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.