The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 05:22, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Massacre of Oromo soldiers in Dessie

[edit]
Massacre of Oromo soldiers in Dessie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pretty simple reasoning, the article doesn't fit Wikipedia's notability guidelines because it has no reliable source covering the alleged massacre. "If no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it." I can't find any reliable sourcing.

Regarding the recent edits to change the wording of the article as only claims still violates WP:ORIGINAL, i.e. you're writing is based on a forum post when there is no reliable source that mentions it (see WP:UGC). Ue3lman (talk) 04:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Pakistan news source does not describe a massacre occurring in Dessie. It also disputable to what degree a news source established last year and with possibly only one staff member with no obvious editing policy is a pass for WP:NEWSORG. Similarly the article about the Ethiopian government also does not describe a massacre in Dessie. FOARP (talk) 13:39, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The irshadgul.com post was published 2 days before the alleged event, so it doesn't make sense as a source for the allegation. It's quite a stretch to assume that "Kitago" is a transliteration of Getachew. The name Kitago appears to be a common Japanese name which doesn't appear anywhere else on the web in connection with Ethiopia or the war. It also contains absurd geographical errors about the capital of Tigray being near the border with Sudan. Clearly not a reliable source for anything let alone events that occured after it was publised. nemozentalk
In principle, if the irshadgul.com article is a translation from an Ethiopian source, then an innocent date error might have occurred due to converting the date from the Ethiopian calendar into the Gregorian calendar. Regarding the transcription, if this went through written Urdu, keep in mind that Persian-Arabic script usually doesn't show vowels, and between voiced 'G' versus unvoiced 'K' is something that can depend on accent, and from 'ch' to 'g' is not impossible either. The geographical "error" could just be sloppy wording - e.g. the intention is to say that the Tigray Region borders Sudan. However, we can't really use a source where this much guessing is needed, with so little sign of editorial checking of content and presentation. After all, what's the point of leaving in random pieces of text such as the half-sentence feast for treatment.? Boud (talk) 03:06, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.