The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 14:11, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mason Moore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage and doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 13:40, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:49, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this pornographic actress. Joe Chill (talk) 17:54, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Retain: Appropriate references could be found out for the actor, Also since actor belongs to Genre pornographic actress significant coverage is optimum (  Abu Torsam  11:46, 13 December 2009 (UTC))[reply]
• Delete Doesn't meet current notability requirements. If that changes, we can always recreate... Tabercil (talk) 17:13, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.