The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep as meeting WP:PROF. Bearian (talk) 19:45, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mary N. Meeker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable individual, or no evidence of notability beyond a professional career. Avruch^Talk 22:37, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd (talk) 23:03, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I fail to understand "no evidence of notability beyond a professional career." she is notable presumably because of a notable professional career. DGG (talk) 00:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - She appears notable to me. Greater than 2 dozen publications in ERIC. Web of Science, which isn't really the place for this, includes "A Critique of 6 Measures for Assessing Creativity" by E. Cooper (1991) describing Meeker's test as "one of six popularly used measures of creativity". --Lquilter (talk) 02:31, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep - she meets criteria 1, 2 and 3 of Wikipedia:Notability (academics) --Paularblaster (talk) 01:37, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.