The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:04, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mary E. Hunter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:BIO. Subject was a schoolteacher, who are not typically notable; I cannot find any sources whatsoever on Google/Gnews/Gscholar. Much of the article revolves around her relationship to other (mostly unnotable) people; the fact that she was the grandmother of a poet who is notable does not help as notability is not inherited. However, searching for sources is made difficult by the fact that the subject does legitimately appear to have a road named after her. I really want this article to be salvagable, but I just can't justify it. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 21:58, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Appears to be a worthy person, but sources not found. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete. Article on a school teacher having no sources. Agricola44 (talk) 15:09, 29 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete. An unsourced biography of a worthy contributor to her community, but not one that is notable by Wikipedia standards. Being a school principal and having a local street named after you are not generally enough, and what it would take to show notability in this case are reliable in-depth and non-local sources that don't seem to exist. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:09, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no sources and even more annoyingly none of those helpful things called dates. Her grandson who has an article was born in 1942.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:24, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per all the above.VictoriaGrayson^Talk 19:48, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.