The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - I wouldn't say that Robinowitz fails WP:V (I think I can verify that he exists), but he does fail WP:BIO. Has no publications to his name besides his website, which does not pass WP:WEB. --Hyperbole 04:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. (BTW, Chip Berlet's description of Robinowitz as "essentially an industrious rumor-mongerer with a penchant for conspiracy theories" was in an email which Robinowitz reproduces here, which is not a WP:RS.) CWC(talk)11:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Primary sourcing is very good, and mostly appropriate, but there are no secondary reliable sources, and no notability established. - Crockspot14:59, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - other than a few articles for a local paper (Eugene Weekly), the stuff this guy writes is mostly published on his own site.--csloat21:47, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, surprised to see an article with such a narrow array of sources ... that being all the same source. considering no secondary sources and other then running a website which isnt very notable in itself, I feel as though the subject fails WP:BIO and the article as a whole obviously fails WP:RS. --NuclearZer012:46, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.