The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:25, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Lewis (offensive lineman)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Practice squad players are not notable per WP:Athlete; subject does not meet other guidelines for notability as set forth in WP:N. Drmies (talk) 05:24, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per failing WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. ArcAngel (talk) 06:56, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:ATHLETE with no prejudice to recreation if he makes the active roster. youngamerican (wtf?) 12:10, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - As NFL practice squad player, should automatically be notable per WP:VERIFY as lesser talented players from lower-level football leagues are notable.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 13:38, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- A few flaws here: first of all, practice players are not automatically notable--that is a given. I don't know what you mean with "notable per WP:VERIFY"--no verifiable notability is proven for this and other practice squad players. That they should be notable because lesser-talented players are notable is doubtful and confused: determining who has less talent is impossible, and ordinarily (unless WP:N is met in other ways) players (such as?) from lower-level leagues (such as?) are not notable. Reread WP:ATHLETE, without trying to make it fit your recent spate of new articles. You seem to suggest a general law for notability for almost everyone in an NFL organization, and that is counter to Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Drmies (talk) 18:47, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - having never actually played at the professional level (yet), fails WP:ATHLETE. If he makes the active roster, I'm not against recreation.--Unionhawk ^Talk ^E-mail ^Review 16:02, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed; no salt necessary. Drmies (talk) 16:05, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:ATH and WP:GNG. As Unionhawk said recreate when notability has been asserted.--Giants27 (c|s) 18:43, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. --Giants27 (c|s) 18:49, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. --Giants27 (c|s) 18:49, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Lewis was just released today by Miami.--Giants27 (c|s) 14:48, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.