- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus was the subject passes WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) Rollidan (talk) 16:47, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Mark C. Storella (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lack of notability Saff V. (talk) 06:45, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I once saw an article that simple said X person is a professor of such and such at z university. All it said. It was prod’d as not notable since there was no indication of publications, honors, etc. the prod was removed with the edit summary that as a professor, the subject is inherently notable. Assuming that is true, then a former ambassador who is a dean is notaBle. Cockwomble22 (talk) 15:36, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep senior diplomat, high-ranking positions, dean of branch of major US government teaching institution (170,000 students), Google News search shows multiple entries in WP:RS. Meets WP:BIO, see WP:DIPLOMAT... was WP:BEFORE done here? Goldsztajn (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.