The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Per WP:SNOW (non-admin closure) Jdcomix (talk) 19:01, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marie-Chantal, Crown Princess of Greece (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of any notability, merely married to somebody barely notable. TheLongTone (talk) 13:46, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Royalty and nobility, and Greece. Shellwood (talk) 14:27, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep In addition to the coverage of her wedding, which is extended, there are reviews of her 2019 book, coverage of her children's line, collaborations with different brands. The article is well-cited and provides coverage spanning a wide range of dates. DaffodilOcean (talk) 17:04, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep because multiple, independent, reliable sources cover the subject in detail over a range of aspects. Perhaps the nominator is thinking that there would not be such coverage if she were not married to royalty, or it is only because of her royal status that she has made her achievements. We do not have such criteria in our guidelines. Thincat (talk) 18:32, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The nominator is really a troublemaker, only targeting articles about irrelevant or deposed Greek royalty—just look at their AfD history. I don’t want to say anything about putting her sons' articles up for AfD, but I never expected the nominator to be so Superman as to nominate the titular Crown Princess of Greece for deletion. I was shocked. She is notable enough to have a Wikipedia article and is more notable than the consorts of other now-deposed German royalty. Please do some research on Google first before making an AfD nomination. There is plenty of coverage that meets WP:GNG. Please don’t use AfD as a weapon—Wikipedia is not your stress-relief zone. Thanks. 45.132.235.203 (talk) 22:09, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I find it ridiculous how this was even put up for deletion. There is more than enough coverage to make her notable so she meets WP:BASIC and therefore meets WP:GNG. Azarctic (talk) 00:02, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep: Pass WP:GNG and WP:BASIC from significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources as a notable person. The nominator clearly did not carry out any WP:BEFORE checks before nominating this. Someone should WP:SNOW close this.

The article subject has been given significant coverage by: The New York Times, The Times, El País, El Mundo, South China Morning Post, El Confidencial, El Español, Business Insider, Vanity Fair, Vogue, Gala, Tatler, Hello!, Point de Vue, Vanidades, Town & Country Magazine, Architectural Digest

-StellarHalo (talk) 05:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.