The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Marg Swarnabhoomi

[edit]

The result was merge with MARG Limited. (Non-admin closure) --Explodicle (T/C) 18:33, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not comfortable with speedying this; there's too much going on here. The article has been a while, but edited almost exclusively by one editor with obvious COI (his/her last edit was removing links because the company websites were getting spammed via those links). This is about a community, but it's a community developed exclusively by one developer. added It wouldn't bother me at all if editors, especially editors active at WT:INDIA, want to keep this article, but I'd really like to see the arguments on both sides of the issue (it's clearly advertising, but on the other hand, it's about a community). - Dank (push to talk) 13:43, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- - Dank (push to talk) 13:43, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. -- - Dank (push to talk) 13:44, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am going to say keep, it is not quite a spam, and as a geographic entity should be kept. There are quite a few web hits for this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: As a geographical place, it should be kept. It has POV/COI problems with the editor, but that's not really a reason to bring to AfD. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 15:04, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~Updated below. Since it's a verifiable place, it seems logical to keep it. For the POV/COI issues best to get it addressed through WP:COIN than AfD. Stubbing it and topic ban for the creator may be a better option, especially given that RS references exist. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 15:22, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or merge with MARG Limited. This is an upcoming commercial housing project and the coverage of the project in the listed sources is somewhat incidental. IMO this does not meet WP:ORG, and there is no justification for treating the topic separately from the company running it. In a few years time, when people are actually living and working here, and if reliable sources provide sufficient information about the demographics, culture, facilities, transportation etc, we can recreate this. Abecedare (talk) 01:59, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with MARG Limited - agree with Abecedare. It is a project in progress. Future community only. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 02:25, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or Merge: Disagree with dank on the aspect that this needs to be deleted because one user is updating it. Details on this wiki page are available on public domain and open to update by anyone. The editor is open to suggestions on improving the wiki page. Merge can be used as an option if this article cannot be improved on. Shrirambr (talk) 12:25, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with MARG Limited per Abecedare. Change of heart, since the place is a future city, it makes sense to have it in the developer's page for now, especially given that the sources currently prove existence, not notability (which would be required since it's not yet an inhabited place). -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 16:38, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Merge with MARG Limited.agree with Abecedare. I felt this article was having more advertising content than encyclopedic and called for Speedy Deletion which was later moved to AfD by Dank (push to talk) Srikanth ^t 05:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.