The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Nearly Headless Nick ^{C} 11:12, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maple World (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

non notable. Not even enough context to begin to classify article, and no sources cited Nardman1 17:29, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• speedy delete and move content to bad jokes & other etc. Cornell Rockey 20:18, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No context, nonsense. --- RockMFR 23:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep and redefine. From what I can tell, this might have to do with MapleStory, which is very notable (even after one (1) AfD). TRKtv (daaaaah!) 17:52, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • What makes you say that? All this appears to be is just somebody's idea for a ninja series. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 00:52, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unverifiable (WP:V). No reliable sources about... whatever this is. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 00:52, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete & Move to BJAODN - Might be a joke. If it has to do with Maplestory, an element of the game is not notable anyway. Greeves ^{(talk • contribs • reviews)} 22:58, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.