The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:58, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mani Dhaliwal

[edit]
Mani Dhaliwal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Dhaliwal Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not believe this article's subject is notable, and their references are not significantly about the individual. Under A7, I believe this article could be deleted.

Further points, the article currently reads as mainly an advertisement for them, and appears to be heavily slanted towards their philanthropic points.Elfabet (talk) 14:35, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This page contains a facebook link as a reference, not a suitable source. Appears to be an Ad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by I.like.pie.4991 (talkcontribs) 14:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 20:12, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:55, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:55, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.