The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Manaka Kubota[edit]

Manaka Kubota (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet NATHLETE. This has been un-bundled from a squib AfD.
For BEFORE I am recycling sources offered by a "keep" voter who said they spoke Japanese offered these sources: profile and coverage from NHK [1], Yomiuri [2], Nikkei [3], multiple posts in Sanspo [4], 47NEWS [ja] [5]. One other source this article was offered. However another voter analyzed the sources and had this to say. None of those are close to SIGCOV, even if we were to give some kind of exception for the depth of Japanese sources (which we should not, because notability is exclusively derived from the amount and depth of IRS SIGCOV, not the importance of someone's achievements). The first is the standard athlete blurb derived from their sports org's website Red XN. The second is a stats page with no secondary coverage Red XN. The third is a passing mention Red XN. The fourth is a press release Red XN. The fifth looks like a local-interest community news story, though I can't access the whole thing. Like all GNG-predicting SNGs, NSPORT standards demand NOTNEWS is met, which means routine reports are not considered SIGCOV.
All in all, I still think this is not a notable athlete; simply qualifying and competing, with resultant routine stats coverage, do not notability make. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:42, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

*:I agree with this comment at all. Also, might it looks like WP:MILL case. Might I am wrong and it is not applies here, so I won't vote. Antonio Vinzaretti (talk) 10:13, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Strike, sock Star Mississippi 19:13, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Delete, per my arguments in the bundled nom.
JoelleJay (talk) 23:15, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment: the bundled nom was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa JahnBri (talk) 00:34, 27 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.