The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Eluchil404 (talk) 07:59, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Male (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for albums. Neelix (talk) 17:40, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Notable artist. Coverage in reliable sources - Allmusic review already linked in article. It took me a couple of minutes to find that it has also been reviewed in The Wire, Option (see CD Review Digest), CMJ New Music Monthly. There's also coverage in the Trouser Press guide.--Michig (talk) 17:58, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, subject of multiple reviews, passes WP:GNG and WP:NALBUMS. Cavarrone (talk) 11:34, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.