The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:15, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Previous nomination. There is finally a consensus emerging here that creations from the election-methods mailing list do not deserve a mention on Wikipedia without further outside notability (other than the subscribers' websites). -- Dissident (Talk) 18:05, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: there's similar article Proportional approval voting. Pavel Vozenilek 01:19, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That article might be salvageable since it contains a reference to an election method that has been invented and used a pretty long time ago. It probably requires a move though. -- Dissident (Talk) 16:29, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep JeffBurdges 16:43, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• It's very interesting, and I think it meets the requirements. Keep. Stifle 01:26, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.