The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep - although no inline citations are provided, there are third-party, independent reliable sources linked to in the article and the notability of the subject is not in question. I doubt there is any contentious material from a BLP point of view, but if there is I would suggest the nominator identify it for cleanup rather than rushing to deletion. Thparkth (talk) 12:59, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above - certainly a candidate for a good clean but pretty well established notability with a couple of sources to back it up. Probably needs cutting back --ErrantTmorton166(Talk)12:59, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.