The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:56, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mahboob Alam

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find any significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject of this unsourced BLP. There are several hits in GoogleNews and GoogleBooks for others with the same name, but not this gentleman. GoogleScholar does confirm that he has been published but the papers that have been frequently cited for which he is the primary author are either systematic reviews or meta-analyses, not his original work, so I do not believe WP:PROF is met either. J04n(talk page) 03:06, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He doesn't seem notable nor does he meet WP:PROF. The lack of responses in 7 days is indicative of his lack of notability! IRWolfie- (talk) 20:12, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.