The result was delete. This has been going on for long enough now, with only the article's subject arguing for a "keep". I am closing this one day early as snow delete. Randykitty (talk) 18:50, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Does not meet WP:GNG. The references seem to be about the subject's alleged product, not him. For that matter, the article is mostly about his product, not him. If one removes all the promotional information, what is left is very sparse indeed, and not backed up by citations. Also, violates WP:COI and Wikipedia:Autobiography. ubiquity (talk) 15:50, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Collapsing IP comments from the same individual. Mike V • Talk 04:04, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
|
---|
|