The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:42, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ML1 Media

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be an utterly WP:NN media organization that hasn't even been able to garner coverage of itself. Article appears to have been created and almost exclusively edited by undisclosed WP:COI/WP:SPA editor(s) here only to promote this company.

This article was ((prod))-ed by @Sp33dyphil: in 2011, but the article creator objected and removed the prod. Toddst1 (talk) 19:55, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:05, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lourdes 05:22, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:00, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article on a digital marketing firm going about its business. No evidence of notability provided or found. AllyD (talk) 07:00, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Bakazaka (talk) 07:09, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no reliable sources. Tera TIX 08:58, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.