The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. (non-admin closure) Störm (talk) 19:58, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MIRA (digital health company)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Störm (talk) 13:42, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep: IwannaKEEP: Keep the article because there is significant press coverage by prestigious publications in-depth. 4.35.91.70 (talk) 16:58, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IwannaKEEP: Reviewed and did not see any violations of WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH since the company was covered by the Washington Business Journal and was verifiable with SAM.gov, System for Award Management (SAM) is an official website of the U.S. government — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.183.117.245 (talk) 17:49, 15 November 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Delete - yet another example of spam, likely created for undisclosed payments, about an unremarkable startup. I've blocked the creator for WP:UPE. The two IPs above are quite likely to be the same person, so I have struck their comments. MER-C 16:15, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Comment above did not argue with the validity of argument WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.173.29.28 (talk) 16:58, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete So much copyright violation going on here, as much of the entry is word-for-word from a Press Release. The rest is promotional or not directly about the company itself. I don't currently have access to the Washington Biz Journal article, but all other press I can see is not substantial or is primary/interviews, which is problematic. Pegnawl (talk) 18:46, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.