The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:17, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MAM USA Corporation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was going to PROD this but then I thought there may be a slim chance good sources aren't in English. Multiple searches (News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary) found no coverage even in the slightest to suggest this is notable. SwisterTwister talk 05:22, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:00, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:00, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Too promotional, in my opinion. TomStar81 (Talk) 11:46, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This article was never tagged as sourceless (which it should've been). I have tagged the page with ((unreferenced)), but I do see how this may not be notable. Also, it has been tagged as a possible advertisment since 2010. Wiki you now, Wiki you later! (talk) 19:23, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.