The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 11:53, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Luso-Britons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Being Portuguese, I hate to see articles about the mother country get deleted. In this case, however, I can make an exception. I see no encyclopedic value here -- lacking in WP:RS, at the very least. Ecoleetage (talk) 23:49, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, term does not seem to have gained any currency. Stifle (talk) 16:15, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unsourced article of a term that appears to be a neologism.B.Wind (talk) 02:54, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.