The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ELIMINATORJR 15:08, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ludmyrna Lopez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable member of the city council of a minor American city. Corvus cornix 20:53, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete - I think she fails WP:BIO at the moment. I could not find significant news coverage, awards or honors or name something substantial that she's contributed. And it's a local office. So, per nom, delete. Douglasmtaylor ^T/C 21:08, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete - Per nom. and also we don't need an article for every gov't official there is. --Kkrouni 21:51, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, well short of WP:BIO. --23:39, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep She passes the google test. She is part of this template ((Richmond City Council (Richmond, California))), and the article is referenced. BTW, in response to the POV pushing comment about "a minor American city," Richmond is large enough to make this list Largest cities in the united states, --evrik ^(talk) 02:13, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Google test proves that she exists. That isn't in question. Corvus cornix 16:58, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Richmond, California, pop. 102,120. Barely makes it into the article, and that isn't the criterion. The absence of substantial 3rd party sources except for one local paper is decisive. DGG (talk) 03:20, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep My feeling is that this is a person you might resonably read about repeatedly in the newspaper. Makes sense to have an encyclopedia article on that sort of topic for the reader who wants more background. ike9898 16:59, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep as per evrik and ike9898. --XDanielx 19:45, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep No Google News articles, 8 Google Blogs postings. But I do agree with evrik. Eagleapex 02:46, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. As long as we have articles on video game, card game, and tv episode characters, i support any accurate article about any actual person. alteripse 16:42, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Any actual person? Where's your article? Corvus cornix 16:56, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as well-sourced BIO, per ike9898, contra alterprise. Bearian 19:19, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep This article is clearly written, well sources, and a component of the Richmond City Council template. There isn't any reason for deletion in my opinion. Waarmstr 09:50, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.