The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 21:24, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Luca A Longobardi[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previous deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luca A Longobardi; moved to draft by user request. Added to, but in my opinion not basically improved, but moved to mainspace nonetheless.

The earlier mistaken identity accounts of his life are a classic ONEEVENT of no lasting interest. As for the book, it is not even in Worldcat, which is a bare minimum. As for the films, one is a video promotion for the non-notable book, and the other won a very minor award--the Best Inspiration Film is not an annual award, it's a monthly award and 12 are given each year in the category. I wanted to check that I'm not engaging in cultural bias, as WorldCat is not all the good for current Italian books, so I checked and he's not in the itWP.

The restaurant he owns is probably notable, and so is the chef. I don't see how it makes the owner notable. The references added are about the restaurant, not Longobardi. DGG ( talk ) 03:14, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've moved the article to Luca Longobardi. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 09:16, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As above, the restaurant may be notable but this does not make the owner notable. Just another pushy nudnik.TheLongTone (talk) 15:42, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per WP:GNG the references provided give significant coverage of the subject in my opinion (apart from ref #1, which is only used for his full name in the infobox). The fact that Interpol issued a Red Notice for him, the highest-level alert they give, should show that his wasn't just any other wrongful arrest and give some degree of lasting interest. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 17:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per the nom and the long talk on the talk page. This is just another person trying to use WP as a promotional tool for his own ends, the page was deleted once and he engaged a paid editor to try and push it through again without initially declaring his COI under the pretext that he has not been paid yet. Domdeparis (talk) 18:16, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I concur with my past comments, I only accepted it by the bare reviews, which in our policies, are simply not enough; overall there's enough concerns to suggest it's still unconvincing. SwisterTwister talk 06:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.