The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:31, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lotte Holdings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article "Lotte Holdings" is unnecessary to be available. Ridwan97 (talk) 06:37, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 June 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:49, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Japan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:09, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep Like the last AfD nomination by the same user, the rationale is clearly invalid. This time, it is also incoherent. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:39, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep, nominator has not provided a valid deletion rationale. --Jklamo (talk) 08:57, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.