The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. WaggersTALK 09:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

London Informer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I searched and think this is not notable Chidgk1 (talk) 17:27, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and United Kingdom. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:27, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• DELETE - Agree, not notable - 17:29, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:09, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not notable fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:47, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• comment in the page present state it is ofcourse delete

1keyhole (talk) 09:12, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.