The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:45, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lolene[edit]

Lolene (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Procedural nom. Previously speedied under LOLENE and re-created in a substantially identical form. Sending to AfD in order to be able to use G4 in future (or, of course, to keep if notability can be asserted). Black Kite 22:18, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Vacuous vanity blather, no real notability asserted, none apparent, no reliable sources.  Sandstein  22:22, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly Count Blofeld 23:06, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• speedy delete - i did some research but evne my best searching could not descover anything more relevent than this or this. While i strongly believed that this person MAY bwcome notable in the future, she si not notable as of yet and this article should be deleted as poer WP:RS, WP:N, and especially [WP:SNOW]] Smith Jones (talk) 00:18, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. If I remember correctly, I'm the one who tagged this for speedy the first time around. The issue of notability has still not been addressed in this latest incarnation. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 01:07, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Doesn't appear to be notable, and a Google search turns up very little. AniMate 05:14, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete, simply not notable. --Blowdart | ^talk 11:34, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete A7, the article says a lot, but when you strip away the marketing copy and peacock terms, she's basically been a backing singer on a mildly successful single, done a bit of songwriting, been in a couple of small-time bands that went nowhere, and is currently writing her first album. There's nothing there to suggest notability, and lets be honest here, barring a divine revelation, this article is simply not going to be kept anyway. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:43, 12 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete per A7. so tagged. Clearly non-notable and underneath all the fluff no assertion of importance or significance. ukexpat (talk) 13:52, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete There is an actual sort-of-notable "Miss Foo Foo", but she is a jeweller that donates part of her proceedings to african charities [1][2] --Enric Naval (talk) 14:31, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per everyone. Edward321 (talk) 15:27, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not yet notable. Speedy tag removed as part of the reason for the AFD is to allow speedy deletion of recreations (you cannot speedy a recreation under the repost criteria unless it's had a proper AFD). Exxolon (talk) 19:52, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Even if it were referenced from reliable sources (which it's not) it would still fail WP:MUSIC (unless the refs were from substantial media coverage). Since no refs, fails WP:V as well. WP:SNOW, anybody? —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 19:52, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.