![]() |
The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 10:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
article deleted via expired prod but now restored. Taking to afd to for larger consensus. Curb Chain (talk) 23:51, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedily deleted by User:INeverCry under criterion G7 (one author who has requested deletion or blanked the page). (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There seems to be consensus that generally primary schools are not notable. This has no indication of notability that would make it an exception. Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 23:21, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A speedy delete/redirect school article candidate if ever I've seen one. --Bob Re-born (talk) 04:53, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedily deleted by User:Drmies under criterion G12 (copyright infringement). (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The article is essentially copied from the Dixie Echoes' website (http://www.dixieechoes.com/dixieechoesgrouphistory.html), but even if it were completely rewritten, there is no evidence of notability in independent, reliable, third-party sources. I am One of Many (talk) 23:14, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 00:55, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD (followed by a personal attack on my talk page). Original concern was: unremarkable TV series. Was on TV for only four months. Article does not establish notability. — Richard BB 19:45, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:00, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
WP:Syn seems to apply here. Suggestion of merging into Terrorism seems well supported. TheMightyQuill (talk) 21:33, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 23:39, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Does not appear to be a notable product. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:47, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:01, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unable to find multiple reliable, secondary sources which provide in-depth coverage of this web-based fashion retailer. Additional sources welcomed, as always. j⚛e deckertalk 18:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:01, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If Trashware was a term in regular use, fine, but it doesn't seem to be. Nice photos. The only references are to a different word and to a dead link. Elvey (talk) 18:15, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete -- Y not? 19:32, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking of tagging this for speedy deletion as blatant advertising, but noticed that that has previously been declined, to my mind inexplicably. Even disregarding the blatancy of the promotion here I can't see any notability. The sources in the article, and others that I have found by following the searches linked above, are all press releases or advertorial content, with none of them being independent. This article came to my attention because I just received a spam email from this company inviting me to register for a web seminar, but I have tried not to let my personal annoyance about that cloud my judgement in nominating this for deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:06, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. LFaraone 01:11, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:GNG as there are is no WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS. Unremarkable school that has little if any coverage, none of which could be considered significant or independent. Would not be opposed to redirecting to List of schools in India until such time as it becomes notable (assuming that it does). FoolMeOnce2Times (talk) 17:36, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:03, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No sources verifying that this individual meets the WP:MUSICBIO guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 13:29, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 14:11, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable photographer. Still an amateur, who has won only awards at the amateur level. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:10, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The consensus here is that there is only one reliable source supporting this page, if someone wants the page userfied until more is available please let me know. J04n(talk page) 20:17, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:MUSIC. The previous AfD was very controversial and the result was keep. The only RS of the article is a paper of Rolling Stone Middle East. One year later, I've found nothing else. Farhikht (talk) 15:19, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:04, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
See list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Japan/Historical people. A review of Nihon jinmei daijiten here is unhelpful. A quick search of Google books shows no support. The stub article does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject. Ansei (talk) 14:28, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
General notability not established, self-published sources __ Just plain Bill (talk) 13:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 14:12, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non Notable book series by author with no page. Karl 334 Talk--Contribs 20:38, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 14:12, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article on a professional wrestler who fails WP:GNG. I could find no significant coverage in reliable sources; only routine coverage of matches and a Facebook page or two. —KuyaBriBriTalk 21:46, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:08, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Only source is a TV Tropes article, which isn't reliable. Intelligent Deathclaw (talk) 11:52, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Vashistha. LFaraone 01:13, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This appears to be a dictionary type definition, or at the very least a minor feature that should be mentioned in another article. I haven't suggested such an article as the obvious redirect (Vashistha), is written such that it is not clear what the article is about. Black Kite (talk) 18:14, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Nike Sports Research Lab. There is no consensus as to the target of this merge, so if whoever carries it out believes one or more of the alternatives are more appropriate feel free to merge as you see fit. J04n(talk page) 20:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Seems quite irrelevant and forgotten about, and possibly theoretical. AppleJack-7 10:44, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. LFaraone 01:14, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure this person is notable enough. Although he won the DFC from 2 countries, this wasn't unusual in WW2 Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
As of the creation of this AfD the size of the Prostitution in South Korea article is 19,813 bytes, far smaller than the size described in WP:LIMIT. Therefore, per CFORK I am proposing that the article be deleted and the content merged into the Prostitution in South Korea article. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 09:42, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]Content forks that are created unintentionally result in redundant or conflicting articles and are to be avoided.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:09, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
At the moment this is a puff piece- the one reference is a self published website. Not sure if his participation in Ready for Love will make him notable in the future Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
---C h i n n Z (talk | Contrib) 09:46, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 06:54, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
PROD template was deleted by IP user without reason. This person fails WP:SOLDIER. Non notable Military person Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy deleted by admin Tom Morris. (Non-admin closure) Stalwart111 08:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Blatant advertising non-notable private company. This company has been sold to Bluecoat Systems and no longer exists as a separate entity. Has been deleted twice before for the same reasons. Now since the company will no longer exist, certainly non-notable. Recommend locking this page to prevent recreation after AFD concludes. Article created by banned pay for hire editor User:MooshiePorkFace Bluecoatadvocate (talk) 07:22, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 01:15, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Don't believe this person is notable. Fails WP:SOLDIER Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was soft delete. LFaraone 01:16, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominated on WP:N and WP:V. Couldn't find independent sources for company within first two Google pages of results. Most results seemed to be either connected to this company or unrelated. Creating user now blocked for spam/WP:COI; see User_talk:Godtechmovie for more on the blocked user. All other edits to article appear to be routine maintenance. Mount Flatten (talk) 08:02, 28 May 2013 (UTC) (Edited by Mount Flatten (talk) 08:33, 28 May 2013 (UTC))[reply]
The result was soft delete. J04n(talk page) 20:25, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
However noble their intentions, this hasn't been picked up by the media as a counterprotest to Innocence of Muslims. It really shouldn't be on Wikipedia. Brightgalrs (/braɪtˈɡæl.ərˌɛs/)[1] 07:58, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
.
The result was Speedily userfy per author's request. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 15:08, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
None of the sources utilized in the article are actually reliable sources. Most are editorials or derisive passing mentions of this work of fiction. Also of note is that the article was deleted last year for these exact same issues.—Ryulong (琉竜) 07:07, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Bagumba's remark concerning WP:CRYSTAL is appropriate for this situation. The discussion of a more appropriate title should continue on the appropriate talk page. J04n(talk page) 20:30, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No new stadium for the Chargers has never broke ground in San Diego, except that is very outdated, and no moves to Los Angeles. JJ98 (Talk) 06:51, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 23:43, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article appears to fail the notability requirements prescribed in WP:MUSBIO. Most Google results point to non-independent sources, and the sources that are independent appear to provide trivial coverage. See [14] and [15] for examples. This group's connection to the Latke–Hamantash Debate could be mentioned in that article. Edge3 (talk) 05:00, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. —Tom Morris (talk) 06:07, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
He's not notable. Jerzeykydd (talk) 02:09, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) czar · · 05:59, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
She's not notable. Jerzeykydd (talk) 02:07, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was nomination withdrawn. (NAC) Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 09:06, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't seem like he's notable. Jerzeykydd (talk) 01:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 06:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A department with only three officers. I do not see how it can possibly be considered notable. DGG ( talk ) 01:24, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:11, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Is this really the name of the seventh film of the series? A Google search says nothing about this being the name. —Chris!c/t 01:02, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 01:17, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The article receives minor views, there is no actual "Licious" franchise acknowledged by the Style Network and is outdated. Information on page can be merged to proper series articles. – Recollected • 02:20, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect per WP:BLP1E. --BDD (talk) 23:52, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Content fork of 2010 Senkaku boat collision incident. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incidents of Endowing and Forfeiting the Titles of Dalai Lama and Panchen Lama. RashersTierney (talk) 06:30, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 01:17, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
previously deleted this year, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metaforic. I dont think anything has changed since then. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:21, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to String (computer science). (non-admin closure) czar · · 07:01, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fail WP:N and WP:NOTHOWTO. The article discusses a very specific technical detail in Java and C#, specifically a workaround for the fact that strings are immutable in those languages. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 13:06, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]