< 16 January | 18 January > |
---|
The result was speedy delete as a hoax per WP:CSD#G3. Bearian (talk) 23:59, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unremarkable place (If exists) It's not on google maps, and with a population of 5, it's too small to be remarkable. Dengero (talk) 23:53, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:16, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article adds no substantial information beyond what is available on Arius, and the bulk of the very short article is actually about Arius, not Baucalis. Propose Merge with Arius ReformedArsenal (talk) 23:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:19, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No citations. No claim to notability. The only book source found via Google was a copy of this article.... Kiefer.Wolfowitz 23:19, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:02, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Part of a large series of unreferenced micro-stubs about football teams in Iran which have not received significant coverage or played at a national level in order to meet notability guidelines. c.f. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ara-e Gharb Kermanshah F.C.. This nomination covers a total of five articles, for which I believe identical deletion criteria apply. C679 22:19, 17 January 2013 (UTC) Four related articles listed below per nomination:[reply]
C679 22:22, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:20, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced article with big neutrality and accuracy issues, started by a sockpuppeteer and now often edited by suspected sock-IPs in the 182.188-range. The Banner talk 22:06, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 21:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I originally PRODded this, but removed it when I realised the creator had been blocked for 1 week, and it was patently unfair. He is now unblocked and willing to do some good, which is always nice to see, but I still believe this player fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 21:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Do you know what, why don't you delete it! It took me an hour to make but I understand I can't say much to contest it. That is why as you may have seen I am trying to get admins on my side to get change these guidelines to allow less known footballers and less notable teams to STAY on Wikipedia and NOT get deleted. Hopefully, in the near future, Jordan Clement will be back on Wikipedia in no time at all.Boomage (talk) 21:59, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Delete as A7. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 22:53, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged for notability for 5 years. Article doesn't make clear what he is notable for, and Google search seemed to show a nn businessman. Boleyn (talk) 21:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep (non-admin closure). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:28, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to fail Wikipedia:NRU#Rugby_union - no evidence that he has actually played for either team in a qualifying tournament - Youreallycan 20:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC) Youreallycan 20:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was KEEP - nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). Whpq (talk) 17:01, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
1. fails WP:GN 2. no sources, quick search did not find any WP:RS (separately philosophical gardens seems to not shed light on the topic) Widefox; talk 20:04, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:24, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unref blp. Went to AfD in 2011 - no consensus. I'm hoping we can establish a consensus this time, or delete as unref blps aren't allowed. Boleyn (talk) 19:16, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:32, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable. Notablity is not established TheOriginalSoni (talk) 18:56, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy deleted (A7) by Amatulic. (non-admin closure) Lugia2453 (talk) 23:43, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged for notability for 5 years; I couldn't establish notability. Google search showed up a lawyer, but nothing on this man apart from IMDB, which shows he has had several roles in films where he has played characters such as 'zombie' or 'hardware clerk' - parts without names and thus presumably non-notable. Boleyn (talk) 18:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
PROD challenged by page creator as it is linked with the Cloyne page, but gives no indication why it is notable. Local sports team who play at an amateur level and have not generated sufficient independent coverage. C679 18:16, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I can put in more references from paper reports etc... if want more notable coverage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomh903 (talk • contribs) 18:23, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:21, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
About a derogatory term for the subject of an existing article (WP:Not a dictionary). Doesn't seem worth merging into that article. JFH (talk) 18:10, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 00:00, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A Councillor is a local government politician. Generally these are ten a penny. My local council has 40 of them. This council has 20 of them. Being a councillor is not, of itself, a notable item. This chap: "A total of 18,228 people voted for him – making him the fifth highest polling Auckland councillor" Well, that doesn't make him notable either. Even the one who came top isn't notable. This is far more like a "Find your local candidate on WIkipedia" effort than an article on a genuinely notable person. Fails notability. Fails as an election biography leaflet too. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 17:55, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to List_of_Nigerian_films#2011. In view of the apparent sourcing difficulties, this seems to be the result acceptable to most participants. Sandstein 11:41, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
article fails to establish notability for films. article fails WP:GNG and does not have any reliable sources. Amsaim (talk) 17:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The Nigerian Cinema industry produces thousands of films every year, and the majority of these remain ignored by the bulk of Nigerian film buffs, critics and Nigerian journalists. Even some films from top Nollywood actresses / actors are not given enough journalistic professional attention in the form of a film review. If Nigerian journalists were to write a review for every film released in Nigeria, they'd spend most of their time doing only that. Take for instance the english-language film Baby Police which was released 10 (ten) years ago in 2003. This films starrs Osita Iheme, one of Nollywoods' top actors. After 10 years there are still no reliable sources available for that film. In 2010 the Baby Police article was taken to AfD and subsequently deleted. In April 2012 a new editor re-created the deleted Baby Police article, again without any reliable sources. The igbo-language film Nkwocha was released in Nigeria sometime in 2011. It's now January 2013, and there are still no reliable sources availble for that film to establish notability. It is therefore not reasonable to expect that reliable sources will be available in the near future. A good precedent to support this is the Baby Police film as mentioned above. Amsaim (talk) 18:41, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to List of Nigerian films#2003. MBisanz talk 00:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
article fails to establish notability for films. article fails WP:GNG and does not have any reliable sources. article was deleted via Afd in 2010. Amsaim (talk) 17:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Withdrawn by nominator per Mark viking's comment.
Article lacks third-party sources and fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. I thought it might have one, but this is not a third-party source, as the author of that article, Stephen Maryka, is the CTO of ICEsoft Technologies. SudoGhost 17:08, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. The article was speedily deleted on 17:09, January 17, 2013 by User:Jimfbleak under the CSD criterion A7. They forgot to close the AfD. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 17:19, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for AFD because this biography of a living person and obviously fails the WP:GNG and WP:ENTERTAINER. It was deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) via a previous unconstested proposed deletion for these same concerns back in April 2012. I could not find any reliable sources to verify the notability of this person. A search engine test does not show significant coverage for this person beyond descriptions at conventions and a few articles. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 16:51, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:24, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This subject of this article, written almost exclusively by a prodigious sock farm, probably fails WP:ENT. There are three references: the first describes itself as "an entertainment/lifestyle forum and a social network" as so cannot be a reliable source. The second is a primary source (the subject's own LinkedIn profile). The third is a celebrity gossip article. Notability/reference cleanup tags have been languishing since June 2012. Psychonaut (talk) 16:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 21:17, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fraud case Umar1996 (talk) 16:22, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
---(striking as per consensus below) Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:49, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:25, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of notability for this podcast aside from a sole mention in some awards whose notability is questionable itself. PROD contested by adding a bunch of self-published sources. Some Wikipedians might be dissuaded from deletion because of this, but not me, I'm afraid. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:59, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 21:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD - original rationale of "Can't see any evidence that he has played in a professional league in order to pass WP:NFOOTY" fairly removed with edit summary of "I can't see any evidence either, but the infobox asserts appearances for Nakhon Pathom in 2009, which if genuine would have been in the fully pro Thai Premier League." The fact that there is no evidence is vital - this article confirms that the player had "a brief spell in Thailand with Nahon Pathom" - but that does not confirm any actual appearances, and therefore there is no evidence this player meets WP:NFOOTBALL. More importantly, this player fails WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 15:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:26, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article dePRODded by creator. PROD reason was "Non-notable journal. No independent sources, not included in any selective databases. Does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NJournals". Randykitty (talk) 14:58, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete per A7 by DGG. (non-admin closure) ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 12:28, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Promotional article about a non-notable gamer. The references provided are from unreliable and self-published sources such as blogs, youtube videos and podcasts. Unable to find any news articles on the subject. - MrX 14:22, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 21:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of notability. Not a Professor nor evidence of scholarly impact. Gbawden (talk) 14:21, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 21:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable military person. No evidence of achieving senior rank or leading a significant body of troops. Notability isn't inherited from his father or his son Gbawden (talk) 14:15, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 16:49, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Struggling to see how this passes Wikipedia:Notability No references, a BIG conflict of interest with editors and only 6 issues published in late 80's.Theroadislong (talk) 13:29, 17 January 2013 (UTC) Theroadislong (talk) 13:29, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 16:47, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not yet notable per WP:NFOOTBALL: signed to a pro team but hasn't yet played in a professional match. Proposed deletion contested by article's creator. Altered Walter (talk) 11:09, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages because they are also new signings to the same team, but haven't yet played in a professional match, with proposed deletion similarly contested by the article's creator on the grounds that they are signed to a pro team:
The result was redirect to List of GMA News TV stations. (non-admin closure) Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:43, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:ORG. I can't find any mentions in Google News or Books. Contested PROD. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 11:08, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Genovese crime family New Jersey faction. MBisanz talk 00:04, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:CRIME and WP:BASIC. The sources in the article only have passing mentions of him, and I couldn't find anything significant online. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 11:01, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:42, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is more or less how to information. It is specific to Indian tax law, and would be better in an article on that subject. I may be mistaken, but I do not see how specific tax form merit their own article. Skrelk (talk) 09:28, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Some pieces of para-scientific heresy diluted in an apparent WP:SYNTH and obvious original research (read Special:PermanentLink/487322572 #References), and with brilliantly ironical title.
It is apparent that four (ironically) different sects draw crosses on the color wheel
and, obviously, cannot converge to an agreement
about values of so named "4 cardinal hues" even roughly, with mismatches about 40° (where adjacent "cardinal hues" should be separated by 90° in average).
Despite this, the article speaks about "these four colors".
The only article's source is http://www.cis.rit.edu/fairchild/PDFs/AppearanceLec.pdf ,
but even worse, data for hues are claimed to be based on that obscure presentation only indirectly.
For example, the article gives 20.14° for red, the PDF gives 24°, and Natural Color System offers 345°.
Likewise, yellow is 90° in the article, but 50° in NCS (note that NCS's yellow is closer to reds of both unique hues and AppearanceLec.pdf than to their yellow).
The fourth different(probably, the same as of NCS —Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:59, 17 January 2013 (UTC)) set of "unique hues" is presented in commons:File:Opponent colors.svg,
related to the opponent process article, which is mentioned in the "unique hues" at the very beginning as the theoretical framework.
[reply]
I do not believe that an article is possible. At best, it may be moved to a section in Hue, after cleansing from the OR. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:24, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:45, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Autobiographical article about apparently non-notable race car driver. No signs of substantial independent coverage in reliable sources; none of the tournaments competed in appear to be particularly notable. Written by autobiographical single-purpose account. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:12, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 21:21, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. Previously nominated for deletion due to lack of sources, one of which was added; there is still no indication of sufficient notability. C679 09:03, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:33, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I can find no mention of this product at all, apart from listings on various download sites, which suggests it fails WP:GNG. WP:PRODUCT and WP:NSOFTWARE too. Alexrexpvt (talk) 08:38, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Ian Gilmour, Baron Gilmour of Craigmillar. Wifione Message 19:06, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This person does not appear to be WP:NOTABLE. DexDor (talk) 06:23, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. If someone wishes deleted data for a future merge, just ask Wifione Message 19:03, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not a youth league, actually a youth team of the Brisbane Roar FC club. No indication why a youth football team merits a separate article. C679 06:09, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Not making my official decision yet but technically the A-League National Youth League is a nationwide league which spans all of Australia at a national level. I think that like in the way we give Premier Academy League teams like Arsenal F.C. Academy or Manchester United F.C. Reserves and Academy a separate article for playing at the national level that we should also do the same for Australia. As long as they can prove they have played in a national level then I see no need for the page to be deleted. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 06:33, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 21:21, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails to meet WP guidelines on notability for living persons. As a music fan I have failed to find anything other than a viral video from 2009, and a single instance of fame doesn't make WP notability. One must win the same award, or album success with a major label twice to meet notability guidelines Monstermarch (talk) 03:59, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 21:22, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing has changed in the four years since this was last nominated. It is still a thinly veiled product advertisement. I have looked for sources again, and found nothing much of substance; most of the hits are either to various companies that sell the stuff, or books on various construction or assembly related topics that mention it in passing. The last deletion discussion ended as "keep and improve", but that hasn't happened. No surprises there- the only two people who tried to improve it were not able to and !voted delete accordingly. Reyk YO! 04:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wifione Message 18:59, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Page is a huge essay about the author's stance on the US government. Existing sources on the page primarily shore up the author's point, rather than establishing notability. Googling the page name comes up with a large amount of Wordpress blogs (that are basically just backlinks), but I wasn't readily able to find anything I'd call a reliable source. InShaneee (talk) 03:00, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 21:22, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like a violation of WP:CRYSTAL to me. It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 02:01, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:08, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The list hereof does not have significant coverage nor established acceptance yet in the motion picture industry. It is a fringe technology which is covered in the individual articles of the handful of films listed as well as the articles on High Frame Rate and Frame Rate. NickCochrane (talk) 00:52, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. The article was deleted by User:Jimfbleak per CSD A7, under the rationale "No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content): Violates WP:CRYSTALBALL." (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 08:25, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Violates WP:CRYSTALBALL Dengero (talk) 00:49, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:05, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unelected candidate in a future election. No evidence of notability. Dmol (talk) 00:46, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. The Bushranger One ping only 00:31, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable in its own right per WP:ORG. A redir to Cambridge University Engineering Department may be an option. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 21:10, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Inline skates. The Bushranger One ping only 00:30, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
WP:OR, WP:NN, WP:NOTMANUAL. Unreferenced article about how to set up wheels for inline skating. The only Google hits I can find for most of the setups are on forums or eBay. Pburka (talk) 12:45, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NGYMNASTICS -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 08:36, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Omar Rodríguez-López discography. The Bushranger One ping only 00:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at a Google search I did not find anything under News or Books. Also, the web search netted very few results and nothing related from an independent and reliable source. As such under WP:ALBUM this content does not warrant a standalone article and should be merged into Omar Rodríguez-López discography. This could also be a multiple article nomination as it seems he has an article for every album of which most are about as filled though I haven't performed WP:BEFORE on any of them. Mkdwtalk 06:15, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:28, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No assertion of notability per WP:CORP; no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Proposed deletion contested by article's creator. Altered Walter (talk) 01:56, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Although I am deleting the article, if someone wishes the contents for a future merge to Baldwin the Eagle, do request me on my talk page Wifione Message 18:45, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism specific only to Boston College: no acceptance in the broader world. Fails WP:NEO and WP:GNG GrapedApe (talk) 02:27, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Boston College#AHANA. The Bushranger One ping only 00:27, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism coined by Boston College: has no acceptance in the broader world. Some minor mentions in articles, but fails WP:NEO and WP:GNG GrapedApe (talk) 02:31, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:02, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
fails WP:GNG. offering visa free travel or incidents of illegal migration (unless massive) do not add to notability. and a competing spice trade rather than trade between countries is hardly notable. bilateral trade of $93 million is tiny, considering Guatemala has a GDP of $47 billion and India, $1.8 trillion LibStar (talk) 02:52, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:21, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article about seemingly non-notable company that fails WP:ORGDEPTH. The only news articles I could find were the result of press releases. - MrX 23:31, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The sources are official websites: - SIIA: 2012 Codie Awards pages - Deloitte: Technology Fast 500 EMEA rankings pages — Preceding unsigned comment added by Felize2013 (talk • contribs) 10:00, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:20, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is an essay, albeit one with bullet points, but it is, nonetheless, pure original research and an opinion piece. It's a decent one, but is nothing more than that in Wikipedia terms Fiddle Faddle (talk) 18:21, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]