The result was no consensus. There is legitimate disagreement here on whether sources published by Paizo are sufficiently independent. Since there is no consensus for either side of the debate, the closure here is accordingly.
I will make a note about the nominator's statement further down in the debate: "Big Mac's comment is not based on any existing WP policy and is thus to be excluded from the final conclusion of this AfD":
As a rule, I don't discard or exclude any good faith contribution to an AFD, even if it is misguided. Rather, I assume that everyone supporting a certain outcome will endorse not only their own, but also the arguments that others have presented that support their position. As such, I look for the best arguments that have been presented on either side, and then assess what level of support they have. Sometimes one side has made no good arguments whatsoever, but this is not one of those cases. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:33, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article about a creature from the Dungeons and Dragons game doesn't meet the General Notability Guideline in that the subject has not received significant coverage (ie. more than trivial mentions) in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Indeed, the article uses exclusively primary sources directly affiliated with the subject: publications and core rulebooks from TSR and Wizards of the Coast, the official D&D publishers; or Pathfinder, a D&D "spin-off" game created by Paizo Publishing (publisher of two official D&D magazines) and using modified D&D rules under licence from Wizards of the Coast.
Obviously this D&D creature has no notability (as Wikipedia defines it) and the article should be deleted.
For those trying to find sources, I can only stress the importance of independence (which "excludes works produced by those affiliated with" D&D or its creator, for example, guidebooks from Bastion Press provinding supplementary material to the D&D rulebooks, under WotC's d20 licencing, are not independent) and significant content (WP:GNG provides an example: "The one sentence mention [...] of the band Three Blind Mice ("In high school, he was part of a jazz band called Three Blind Mice.") is plainly trivial."). Folken de Fanel (talk) 00:26, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect to List of cities and towns in California. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 04:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A similar title already exists at List of largest California cities by area, which redirects to List of cities and towns in California. This simply ranks eight cities in a different way. Anyone searching for such a list would likely search by "area" rather than "acreage" and this article only provides redundant information rather than fulfilling a specific need under WP: List. Taroaldo (talk) 23:45, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. WP:MADEUP The Bushranger One ping only 04:17, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism, OR. See the end of the article and talk page that confirm this: something someone thought up two days about and decided to put on WP. Deprodded with extra confirmation that it's OR JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 23:09, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. 'Quoth the Raven...' The Bushranger One ping only 23:50, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A short story that doesn't seem to have any notability. It was published only in a minor anthology (that itself seems to be completely unnotable), and no reliable sources exist that talk about this story at all. Without a single source to establish notability, it fails the GNG. Rorshacma (talk) 22:48, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. No prejudice against recreation as a redirect if desired. The Bushranger One ping only 23:50, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A neologism that seems to have been created and used by only a single individual. No reliable third party source exists at all that uses this phrase, and the few hits I got in reference to it was always used in conjunction with the author that made the phrase up. With no sources to show any kind of widespread use, it should be deleted per WP:NEO Rorshacma (talk) 22:20, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. WP:SNOW The Bushranger One ping only 04:23, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article about a non-notable film created by a user (GGandUProductions (talk · contribs) who has edited two article and shares a name with the "film company" that created the film in question.
Films fails WP:GNG with no Google News search hits and no Google News Archive search hits in he first 5 pages of hits. Film also fails WP:MOVIE with no major distribution or major awards won. I haven't dealt with film notability extensively but after reading through WP:MOVIE and topics covered on WP:FILM, I see no other inclusion guidelines that would apply. OlYeller21Talktome 22:00, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 23:51, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD. Little information and unsourced. PROD was contested as this concern had been addressed. However, Mr. Thompson has not received significant coverage or played in a fully pro league, meaning this article fails both WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:13, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Per WP:HEY — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:10, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Arts administration (due to Voceditenore addressing issues) 1. no indication of notability of this term 2. WP:COATRACK for book/advert/COI/SPA 3. refs 2 and 3 only tangentially related to term, so only a single source of an obscure bookWidefox (talk) 19:30, 12 June 2012 (UTC) updated Widefox (talk) 08:57, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 23:52, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a indiscriminate collection of statistics. Not supported by reliable sources. Original research. Cloudz679 19:19, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. -Scottywong| prattle _ 15:04, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Subject known stricly in his capacity as member of Raveonettes; article a stub, laking even elementary references. - The Gnome (talk) 18:55, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:37, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Entry for an award given for winning a race; the race itself has no Wiki entry. No sources in the entry, and I can't find any sources anywhere that mention this award, other than mirrors of this page, although the race itself does exist. Not notable or verifiable. Several early versions contain attacks or vandalism from the entry creator (e.g. this edit), possibly the whole thing is a hoax. Hairhorn (talk) 18:51, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. No prejudice against recreation if she makes the team — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:13, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
United States gymnast who fails to meet any of the criteria set by WP:NGYMNAST or WP:GNG. The Secret U.S. Classic is not the top level competition of women's gymnastics in the US. This athlete may be destined for great things, but not yet. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:46, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:37, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
WP:TOOSOON. Only graduated from design school in 2011. Only "award" is as a finalist (one of 12, beyond the 4 winners). Beyond one award reference, others are self-produced or just notice of school exhibition. No other independent RS. Fails WP:ARTIST. Michitaro (talk) 04:06, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Home Invasion (album). Drmies (talk) 18:15, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Does not pass NSONG — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:43, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 19:29, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Same information is already on List of flag bearers for Belgium at the Olympics.
The result was SNOW DELETE. Blatant, self-admitted synthesis and personal essay. JIP | Talk 19:47, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This look like a WP:SYNTH, does not belong on wikipedia The Determinator p t c 16:29, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 23:55, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No credible assertions of notability. A blogger (is anybody not a blogger these days?), and a radio presenter (not specified for whom). Claims that Rugg "worked for" various major publications, but this claim is not supported by citation, nor is the nature of the work made clear (was she the managing editor, or the mailroom worker?). Other claims to fame are similarly vague. The "presenter" gig on "Tafe Radio" appears significant until one discovers that Tafe Radio is the student-run radio station at Petersham College where students broadcast as part of their curriculum. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:25, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 23:56, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Amateur club which has never played in the FA Cup or in the top 10 levels of the English football league system, the usual rule of thumb used by WP:FOOTY. DOesn't pass WP:GNG either -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:00, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 23:58, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No assertion of notability. A blogger and community organizer for a project conceived by someone else (Huston is mentioned at the project's site, but not in any of the project's news coverage). WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:04, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —HueSatLum 15:22, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Sat here unreferenced for years. The topic is arguably notable, but we have no article here to justify it. There's no content here beyond "Software systems are systems of software." There are now some references, but there was a time when an encyclopedia involved editorial work, more than just pasting string overlaps from Google. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:36, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 23:58, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Barely a claim of true notability in this resume-like, near hagiography. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources able to be found. The-Pope (talk) 15:11, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Macro photography#35 mm equivalent magnification. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:41, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article is on a concept or neologism of apparently insufficient notability. It should be covered in the article Macro photography instead of standalone. See discussion on its talk page. Dicklyon (talk) 15:07, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:42, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to potentially be locally notable for his area, but I'm seeing nothing insofar as anything that meets general notability. -- Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 06:22, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
He has had a recent review on national public radio about his current album, nationally notable enough to be reviewed on Fresh Air. http://www.npr.org/artists/153197900/john-fullbright Esdoss (talk) 06:31, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to 1st_Cavalry_Division_(United_States)#Vietnam_.281st_Air_Cav.29. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:15, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:AIRCRASH for Military accidents. Nobody notable on board. Crash was tragic but should be on list of military accidents only. ...William 13:44, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 23:59, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article about a mountain that doesn't seem to exist (and surely not in the Engelhörner as the article says). According to Swisstopo (online maps) there is simply no mountain named "Grosses Ritzhorn" in Switzerland. ZachG (Talk) 12:59, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was red carded. The Bushranger One ping only 00:01, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article created probably by his agent with a lot o of unsourced, likely false info. No evidences that he meet WP:NFOOTBALL Oleola (talk) 13:02, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Needs cleanup and a move — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:17, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable, fails WP:MUSICBIO even after rewrite following previous deletions. No coverage in WP:RS, no charted music, no gold records, no national/international tours that are covered, not on major/important indie label, not a notable ensemble, not a prominent rep of a notable style, no awards/nominations, no competition wins, not in rotation nationally, and not featured in a radio/TV broadcast segment. Probably WP:TOOSOON. GregJackP Boomer! 12:40, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Article significantly improved, nomination withdrawn, consensus that notability now established. (non-admin closure) -- Trevj (talk) 10:50, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No indication of notability; Jakarta has something like 200 malls. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:59, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep (non-admin close). Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:18, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The article has no meaning. The team has not yet played a match. That is to say that the team does not exist.--Uishaki (talk) 11:22, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 08:59, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Declined speedy (and BLPPROD), article is about a race car driver who won rookie of the year in a non-notable stock car division. Sources check came up negative, no General Notability Guidelines passing for me. kelapstick(bainuu) 09:07, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete as blatant hoax, nothing to discuss here. - filelakeshoe 07:49, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable; "Soon to be famous" is not enough and other information is false, at least according to a quick web search — Yerpo Eh? 07:15, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. as an unsourced BLP. The Bushranger One ping only 06:39, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article has existed for over three years and only supported by a facebook page - reveals low independent notability - Youreallycan 06:38, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 06:37, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Notability not established. Not enough sources. Not notable enough to be in wikipedia. Bharathiya 19:12, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:53, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fringe theorist and writer of unread science fiction whose only claim to notability is that a friend of his, another prolific fringe theorist, once described his ideas as "brilliant" but filled with "misunderstandings". No nontrivial GNews or Gbooks hits; web coverage appears limited to promotion for his books and unreliable/fringe sources. BLP article includes no references and no reliable sources. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 14:50, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article contains no sources, and I've been unable to find any. Doesn't appear to meet WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. Not that it really matters, but the article creator is the son of the producer/writer/composer/lyricist. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 06:20, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Enough sources to pass WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) —HueSatLum 15:19, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
..... Well two of the shows have happened, so there you go. Second,the set list is an actual reliable source and so are the venues along with the dates and location. Third, these have been actual events. So just leave it be because I am sure many people find this information helpful and not just an announcement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.101.169.214 (talk) 04:59, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as promotional. Only one of the shows has been done so far, and the only reliable source is nothing more than an announcement. Note that I removed some promo videos by SM Entertainment--this, like many pages on SM Entertainment, has no encyclopedic value. If reliable sources report on the actual events, that's a different story. Drmies (talk) 16:58, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. While Quasihuman does make a decent argument that the subject passes WP:BAND, there's not enough participation here for a "keep" close. Also, the article has some serious sourcing issues. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:04, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article has no reliable sources. A quick Google search has not revealed any coverage of the topic. Only sources are social media and self promotion. —Charles Edward (Talk | Contribs) 12:16, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Lake Chelan. Redirect too — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:21, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable 67.112.204.118 (talk) 06:22, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:06, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable film. Claims to have won an award at a film festival but after checking the festival itself seems to be far from notable [14]. Only coverage seems to be in a handful of blogs, and no one associated with the production appears to pass the GNG. Part of a long series of articles all created by sockpuppets all involving the same small set of non-notable cast and crew. Ridernyc (talk) 14:06, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete WP:CSD#G11:G11: Promotion; G5: Created by a blocked user in violation of a block; G3: Apparent hoax. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:20, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Has had an "unreferenced" tag since April 2010. Is it a college, as the article states, or a high school, as the infobox states? Gtwfan52 (talk) 06:12, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 06:42, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable album, fails WP:ALBUM JayJayTalk to me 02:02, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Abu Sayyaf. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:08, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable event. Also this is not the 4th nomination I was having troubles nominating this article using Twinkle JayJayTalk to me 01:49, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. No consensus to delete, weak consensus to merge but no consensus for a target. That can be discussed on the article's talk page. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:11, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
DePRODed by author claiming that this is a creation for a legitimate redlink. Concern was: Unreferenced. Wikipedia is not a dictionary Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:04, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
*Merge to fellow traveler. Also deal with redirect to "bandwagon effect." Mfhiller (talk) 02:59, 13 June 2012 (UTC)mfhiller[reply]
The result was redirect to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters. Not notable enough for separate article - appropriate as part of list of creatures (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:06, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable minor creature from Dungeons & Dragons. This is a summary of sections of D&D Monster manuals. I'm tempted to say WP:NOTMANUAL, but I really want to say WP:NOTMONSTERMANUAL. Salimfadhley (talk) 00:09, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Per Torchiest, to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 1st edition monsters - valid as a redirect to a list for inclusion, but unsuitable/not notable enough to include on its own. BarkingFish 00:21, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:23, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't find reliable information about the article, not on Google News, not on Google Books, so i nominate it at AfD, since it has many citation and notability tags from September 2011. Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 03:10, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 14:42, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article subject fails WP:NOTABILITY and WP:NMODEL criteria Demdem (talk) 05:43, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There are many links and press on Tiffany Pisani and she is currently still modelling full time and internationally.
I strongly recommend keeping this individual as she is still young and I believe she will continue to succeed.
It is important that this page remains as it is a very trust worthy and should not be suddenly deleted, non of the terms have been violated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toffey20 (talk • contribs) 19:08, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 06:45, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NN book series failing WP:NBOOK. Unable to find any indication this series meets any of WP:BKCRIT.
The following books in this series are nominated to be deleted with this series:
Toddst1 (talk) 18:24, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 06:47, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Completing nomination for User:Paxti. On the merits, I have no opinion. The original nomination, mistakenly posted to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ross Jeffries, follows. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 19:20, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination of page for individual who appears to have little notability and appears to be have been created for self promotion. He is involved in the "pick-up" industry which is notorious for unsubstantiated promises of success for men with the opposite sex and for shameless self publicity in an attempt to make profits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paxti (talk • contribs) 17:54, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete To add further, the referencing is extremely poor and no convincing material is available to suggest this page is notable.
Not only is the topic seemingly non-notable, but it also appears to exist only because of multiple editors and should be deleted as per WP:SOAP --Paxti (talk) 19:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Although strong concerns about a rather concerted effort by a family member in play, there appears to be enough sources to now meet GNG and ENT (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:05, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable Norwegian actress. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:45, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 06:48, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NN company - unable to find any significant coverage - plenty of directory listings, linkedin, and a few passing quotes by employees. Toddst1 (talk) 21:54, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) →TSU tp* 06:56, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't appear to meet the general notability guideline or the notability guideline for organisations (contested prod) – Arms & Hearts (talk) 22:51, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
How is it not notable?? It's the first Matam in the capital Manama. Ilikecod (talk) 11:36, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]