The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. The original author, S. L. Lopez (talk · contribs), requested deletion on 2011-07-26. It was declined on the grounds that other editors had touched the page. Of those seven other people, one also wanted the page deleted and disputed its entire contents on the talk page, and six made no content contributions and were only adding tags or fixing links. Indeed, two of the six were robots. Given the OTRS request, I've belatedly fulfilled the speedy deletion request from a year ago, with no prejudice against a properly written article that addresses the complaints of advertising, copying non-free content into Wikipedia, and blatant hyperbole that were raised on the talk page by Swanson16 (talk · contribs) a year and a half ago. Uncle G (talk) 08:44, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Living Bread International Church (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

OTRS Ticket 2012112910007208

Please nominate the article about our Church Living Bread to be deleted.

This is not who we are or what we represent.

We are sorry that your company is being used for ugly gossip against us.

thank you for the consideration

Apostle Karen Dunham

Living Bread International Church Jerusalem

 Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:46, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Sounds like it could be notable, although probably the person is more so than the organization. So far the one source does not really establish notability. Steve Dufour (talk) 23:54, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Cameron11598 (Talk) 02:18, 30 November 2012 (UTC) [reply]

• Delete Per nominator, per request. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 23:08, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. StAnselm (talk) 00:23, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - I'm not sure if this church is notable, but I don't think the nomination reason is valid for deleting an article according to our policies. In any case, I didn't see the "ugly gossip"—perhaps it was revdel'd or removed by an oversighter. There is a similarly named church in Florida, USA, so I'm not sure if the one in Israel is notable. - MrX 03:36, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment -- Some one has reduced the contnet to a stub. The previous text does not look controversial, or particularly differnet from what appears on their own website. Unfortunately, there is no indication of size or the extent of the church's ministry. I thus have nothing by which to judge whether this is or is not a notable church. The person requesting deletion may or may not be connected with the church - one just cannot tell. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:58, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.