The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by KillerChihuahua (talk · contribs) under CSD G4. Non-admin closure. --Dhartung | Talk 00:53, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lithium Eight (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

A non-notable band that seems to fail WP:BAND. Zero google hits for '"Lithium Eight" +band', so it's hard to establish verifiability. The only claim to notability is a tv performance in advance of a weekly lottery draw, which "...did not go down well with the viewers...". Bfigura ^(talk) 23:13, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as nominator for all of the reasons listed above. Bfigura ^(talk) 23:13, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I'm the one who declined the ((db-band)) on this, due to the claimed TV coverage, but I can't see this passing notability. That said, there might be reliable sources in Spanish if someone can find them. — iridescent (talk to me!) 23:25, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Good idea Iridescent. My spanish is semi-proficient, so I looked, but kept getting killed by the facts that Nirvana has a song called Lithium as the 8th track of some CD, and that Lithium pulls up horde of medical/chemical references. More ingenious google-er's are welcome to try though. Cheers, --Bfigura ^(talk) 23:36, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.