The result was delete. Consensus seems to suggest that the list is trivial or indicriminate, and thus unsuitable for inclusion. Editors wishing to rewrite the page may simply recreate it under a different title if necessary. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:15, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The article contains no important, or notable, information. iMatthew talk • take my poll at 01:23, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]