The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:23, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of mistakes in Warriors (Book Series)[edit]

List of mistakes in Warriors (Book Series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This appears to be completely original research (who's to say what is a mistake and what is meant?) and is not very encyclopedic. Metros 03:31, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as WP:OR. Printing errata? WP:POINT? Ford MF 03:48, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete it's also just a list of trivia. Useight 03:52, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Mixture of typos and oversights, at best. If we start admitting articles about trivial errors in printing and filming, where will it end? Deor 04:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Really not useful, and it seems to be a collection of indiscriminate information per Metros. Look at the last entry: "no mistakes, because it's not yet published"! Nyttend 04:48, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not encylopedic knowledge nor relevant knowledge. Mattl2001 06:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Useless trivia. -Tacubus 13:20, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as OR (could be userfied). JJL 17:34, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, WP is not for lists of errata. IPSOS (talk) 23:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Only useful in the parent article, if it is really necessary but not IMO--JForget 01:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - trivia, original research. Moreschi ^Talk 17:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions. -- Pax:Vobiscum 15:24, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• KEEP IT!!!! It might not be useful, but people sometimes thing its fun to look up mistakes in books. I do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.203.201.18 (talk • contribs)
  • Comment Please take a look at WP:ILIKEIT to see why something being "fun" to look up isn't a reason to keep an article. Metros 00:25, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.