The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. Unless this list contains nothing but full addressess and contact numbers etc, it dosent work as a "directory". This is nothing more than a simple Wikipedia:Lists of names classified by type, and that is permissable in wikipedia. Otherwise, I will be questioning the existance of just about any article in Category:Lists.--Huaiwei06:40, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Hirohisat. Since this is a legitimate grouping, there's no reason not provide a structured, annotated list which is far more informative and useful that the blank lists provided by categories. Kappa03:26, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Actually a category is not a good idea, because it would spam up the company articles with a category for every country they operate in. Nevertheless a legit grouping for a list. Kappa03:34, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not useful for navigation as the list is almost all redlinks and really provides little if any information. This list is exactly what I would expect to find in the Singaporean Yellow pages and Wikipedia is not that. Pascal.Tesson18:36, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.