The result was snow close No support from other than nominator Nobody Ent 13:54, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:NOTDIR WIkipedia is not a list KoshVorlon. Angeli i demoni krushili nado mnoj... 18:38, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP: This is a good list of people on here. This is considered a list people, in a specific country, who were assassinated and killed in that country. However, This should NOT be a directory for people, but a simple list of people on who were assassinated. So overall stating this, I would agree with you all. It should be moved, or modified in a different form. The article would be best cleaned up and there should be a silver lock if needed. Vmkcheat —Preceding undated comment added 22:44, 25 May 2012 (UTC).[reply]
a.)NOTDIR is policy , that is consensus that wikipedia articles are not be to lists. This is a list,nothing more.
b.)Consensus now needs to be shown that it should stay and WHY so far,that hasn't happened. Most of this is attacks on myself and the nomination. As consensus has decreed Wikipedia articles can't be lists, you should all be showing consensus why it should stay or else it goes.
....that clear enough for you, Postdlf?
KoshVorlon. Angeli i demoni krushili nado mnoj... 20:03, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You have now further made a completely preposterous statement that "consensus has decreed Wikipedia articles can't be lists...", which I cannot believe is a good faith interpretation of WP:NOTDIR given that its own introduction says "Wikipedia encompasses many lists..." See also Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Stand-alone lists, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists, and Wikipedia:Featured lists, all of which would be curious things to exist on WP if lists should not. You could also see any number of AFDs regarding lists or lists of people that are leaning "keep" or have been already closed as "keep". I don't see how you could not be aware of any of that. Which means either you were so incredibly careless in starting this AFD so as to not take note of any relevant AFDs or to read any relevant guidelines and policies, including the one you cited; or you knew all of this and proceeded instead, making this purely disruption to prove a point if not outright trolling. Either way, this is completely unacceptable. We can take it to WP:ANI if I haven't made my point, but the fact that this AFD (and another list AFD you started at the same time that has already been SNOW-closed) has received no support at all should alone tell you something. postdlf (talk) 20:53, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia encompasses many lists of links to articles within Wikipedia' that are used for internal organization or to describe a notable subject.
This is not a list of links to articles, it's simply a list. Per that same policy, that list cannot remain here.
This is hardly a pointy nom, nor made in bad faith. It's simply enforcing existing policy.
If you disagree with the policy,feel free to post an RFC on it and change it. Otherwise, show a reason why it must stay.
Once again, discuss the article, not it's nominator.
KoshVorlon. Angeli i demoni krushili nado mnoj... 21:35, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]