The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein (talk) 06:22, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Jewish jurists[edit]

List of Jewish jurists (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Guess this should be removed, as the topic isn't quantifiable, and thus doesn't give any weight in special notability of the subjects. _→AzaToth 20:47, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 21:20, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 21:21, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I fail to see why the religious beliefs of jurists are relevant, plus this isn't even a list of jurists, but of court officials. And including those from Israel is a no-brainer. Article fails to establish why being Jewish has any bearing on this. Potential WP:BLP issues, too. I'm surprised this article has survived so long, frankly. 23skidoo (talk) 12:51, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Wikipedia:Listcruft, same as Non-notable intersections by ethnicity, religion, or sexual preference. Also, similar lists have been deleted so far. IZAK (talk) 17:21, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable intersection. --MPerel 06:45, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.