The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Generally speaking, full professors who are published are considered notable.. - Philippe 19:46, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lev Bulat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

I had prodded this as the résumé of a non-notable person (and lacking in context), until I realized that Cambrasa (talk · contribs) had attempted to AfD it but never finished the process -- i.e., no discussion page was made, and no tag was placed on the page. Since technically an AfD was attempted, I figured that PROD didn't apply so I'm taking it here. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:41, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The unfinished AfD was apparently the result of a Twinkle error. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 18:00, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 18:10, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

comment i think this person is of good notability in Russia ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}. so it would be nice if we have some strong reason to delete this .--@ the $un$hine . (talk) 18:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• keep based on the university and the persons position this article needs a keep .--@ the $un$hine . (talk) 13:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Just a long list - no sources or references Dreamspy (talk) 20:17, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per nom. No reliable and verifiable sources, per WP:RS and WP:V. No context; WP is not a resume database. Visor (talk) 20:43, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as this isn't the place for curricula vitarum. If the person is in fact notable, no objection to a real article in prose, without an exhaustive list of every publication. Deor (talk) 02:49, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. It is possible he is a notable academic, but this needs to be totally rewritten. Per Deor, this is not a place for a CV.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 04:44, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. —_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 04:45, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and edit. Full Professor and Head of the Department at St. Petersburg State University, a very major Russian Univ., is notable. 9 books. Between that and the position shows that the experts in his field keep him notable. Needs to e rewritten, obviously. DGG (talk) 14:22, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment yup , this university and the person r both highly notable , so i wish this article need to be rewritten if such is needed .--@ the $un$hine . (talk) 13:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Neutral for now. The professor can be notable but no notability claims were presented. Lets wait a couple of days what they would come up with Alex Bakharev (talk) 07:27, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.