The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎ . Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 20:53, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Leonard Arthur Bethell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been twice rejected at AFC - rightly in my view - but moved by its creator into mainspace. I think it needs to go back to draft for further work. Too much reliance on primary sources, long sections of unsourced material, and speculation. What is lacking is depth coverage in reliable independent sources. Mccapra (talk) 18:17, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

::Algeria is hard to source and almost impossible in English. The French article is longer, but not all that much help. It does say that the Algerian were there with armored vehicles. I could, actually, conceive of such a battle being ignored since Algeria would have been newly independent and probably wasn't expected to stand chance against Israel. That doesn't mean that that's what happened though. As far as the author goes, he was a wartime general who saw action in this war. How is that not notable. I think you must be getting that assessment by looking for book reviews or something. I also strongly suggest checking in Arabic. Hth Elinruby (talk) 01:37, 11 April 2023 (UTC)<--moving thisto the discussion about the battle in the Yom Kippur War. Elinruby (talk) 21:57, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

yes my mistake. will move it shortly.Thanks for the good catch. Elinruby (talk) 19:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PS can someone tell me the correct way of putting a comment on this stream? at the moment I’m using text edit and it doesn’t produce all the features. Charles.bowyer (talk) 21:19, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:57, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.