The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 07:59, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Leib Pinter

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP1E. Minimal sourcing. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 02:20, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 09:25, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - hmm.. perhaps a very very sshort article but the sourcing points towards that the events actually happened and are notable. I let more people get into the discussion to create a consensus.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:37, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I am going to hold off on making a recommendation for a moment, however, I wanted to add the following to the discussion: 1) After examining the first citation, I have strong BLP concerns regarding the subject's alleged involvement in organizing a book ban. 2) GNews does show two separate brief news events involving the subject - a bribery trial/guilty plea in the late 1970s (see Daniel Flood#Censure and resignation and GBooks) and the mortgage scam thirty years later. I am leaning towards redirect to Daniel Flood, however, I am willing to wait to see what others dig up. Location (talk) 17:00, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it is a case of minimum achieved notability. But is still notability, that was why I said Keep.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:22, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. As far as the zootorah.com link - "He did not disclose their identities, but I later learned that they included" and "I was also tipped off that a close friend of" seems to be almost libelous and is hearsay. As far as the Lukford.net/blog blog, he seems to bash people on his blog, then advertises his own services on how to "Reclaim Your Reputation Online" by "And you can hire me to help you." http://lukeford.net/blog/?page_id=4872 As far as Reuters is did not say (for the second time). He is one of untold number or people arrested and sent to prison. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobbyd2011 (talk • contribs) 17:27, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack of notability as per nominator.

--俄国 (talk) 14:46, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.