The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.—Quarl(talk) 2007-02-08 10:08Z
No Delete - citation added from game creator's diary. Unless contested will remove delete notice in 48 hours. 17:31, 2 February 2007 (GMT) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.42.44.193 (talk • contribs)
Comment the citation certainly proves the game exists, but that's not disputed. The citation doesn't show any way in which the game passes the notability criteria. Please don't remove the deletion notice - that's for the admins to do when they've decided on the arguments presented here. Percy Snoodle19:10, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete - no direct evidence of notability and no independent or third-party sources, but the existence of two "unofficial forums" could indicate that it has a large fan base. Nonetheless, delete unless more sources can be found. Walton monarchist89 11:23, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.