The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus to delete. Eluchil404 20:37, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrence G. Costanzo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Not notable enough for an entry at this time. Freedomeagle 22:05, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I'm not sure precisely how notable the office is, but the man doesn't seem to have enough coverage to satisfy notability guidelines. I found 20 hits on Google, which made it pretty easy to see that there was nothing considered a good third party source among them. --Moonriddengirl 13:24, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep He is notable by virtue of the office he holds. --Briancua 20:01, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Briancua, if it can be verified. It's not my church and it's not my thing, but it's an extremely important position for a Roman catholic layperson. Bearian 19:02, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.