The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep; nomination withdrawn and concerns addressed.--Fuhghettaboutit 06:50, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Law Practice managment software

[edit]

Unnecessary list, nothing said about any of the software, sole source is just another list of software. superβεεcat 18:41, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - wouldn't this be considered a copyvio or text dump? -WarthogDemon 18:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Not sure if it's quite a copyvio or text dump (the linked website has a lot more content, organized) but it's definitely nothing but a list without any context. - superβεεcat 18:45, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per WP:CSD#G12 - besides, it's just a list —Travis ^talk 18:56, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remove !vote per nominator. —Travis ^talk 02:49, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--Targeman 23:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - specific and notable type of software. Article only created yesterday. I take it upon myself to improve (give me 48 hours). Wl219 22:20, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep as this is a huge issue in paralegal studies and Law office management today. I'd be glad to help out. It may need renaming and moving. Bearian 00:13, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

REMOVE NOMINATION After a discussion with Wl219, and recent edits to turn this article into a useful stub, I'm convinced that in its new form an article can be developed. - superβεεcat 00:38, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.