The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:N and WP:SNOW (non-admin closure). SeanMD80^{talk | contribs} 03:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Laurence Kavanagh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable. Niaz^{(Talk • Contribs)} 13:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong keep. Notable historical figure [1], as the article makes perfectly clear. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 13:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Being a member of the Nova Scotia House of Assembly for 10 years is enough for me. Aecis^Brievenbus 14:04, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Why do you say that? Charles Matthews (talk) 14:11, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as he was an Assemblyman.--CastAStone/^{/₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€} 14:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep - this article qualifies based on the most basic principle for notability for persons: "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject." --Big_iron (talk) 21:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Now obvious snowball keep AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 00:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.