The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 06:04, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Latin Asia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Newly-coined term. The Philippines and East Timor do not and are not recognised as a "Latin Country". Even if there was a term/region/culture called Latin Asia the page is innacurate in not naming all the countries of Asia that have any significant influence from a "Latin Country" (whatever that means). Jandela 06:37, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as non-notable neologism with no sources to assert that there is any wide use of this term. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 06:51, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non notable neo logism Taprobanus 14:06, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- Per above ChrisLamb 15:16, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, SqueakBox 19:18, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NEO, too few uses let alone substantive references in independent publications, per WP:NEO. --Dhartung | Talk 19:29, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Neologism, zero notability. --Targeman 21:20, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.