The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn due to article improvement.. LibStar (talk) 07:17, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Laotian Australian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If all the article can state is something straight from the Australian census then I don't think it's worthy of an article as per WP:NOTDIR. the only thing I could find related is this but easily be covered in the actors own WP article. LibStar (talk) 05:31, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Borgarde (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 06:53, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep --- has entry in Jupp's The Australian people: an encyclopedia of the nation, its people and their origins. Suitable topic for a printed encyclopedia = suitable topic for Wikipedia. Sources added to article. cab (talk) 06:53, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.